Sunday, August 12, 2012

Blog Entry 14: Satrapi's Persepolis

I've made two posts already on Satrapi, so I think I won't write a fresh one:

http://nknowles-reading.blogspot.com/2009/11/blog-14-quote-response-satrapi-1.html

http://nknowles-reading.blogspot.com/2011/08/persepolis.html

Blog Entry 13: Frost "The Road Not Taken"

Robert Frost's "The Road Not Taken" has got to be the most-written-about poem in ENGL 104. I imagine it resonates particularly with Americans because it seems to be about individuality, that you've got to take a road different from the one other people would take. I'm all for individuality, but sometimes I wonder if we don't stereotype it in the way that young people declare their individuality through the same clothing that all other young people are wearing. Is it good to be unique in an acceptable way, or is it good to be unique in a really weird way that others won't understand? To be honest, I don't think we're as individual or as tolerant of individuality as we'd like to think.

Also, I don't think this poem is really about individuality, at least not in the puffed up way of "I'm going to be different from everyone else!" Here's why: whenever people try to analyze this poem, they spend a lot of time on the idea that the road taken "was grassy and wanted wear" (line 8), which suggests few people have taken it. But, then, later in the poem, the persona takes back the idea that there was a significant difference between the roads: "the passing there/Had worn them really about the same" (lines 9-10). So, if the roads are "worn [. . .] about the same," the persona can't really tell the difference between them in terms of prior travel. This retraction is just A LINE BELOW the line that everyone likes to focus on. Why doesn't anyone see it? I don't think we want to see it because we want to read this poem in the stereotypical American way. Also, the ending goes back to the "less traveled by" idea (line 19), which creates a more lasting impression.

So, why did Frost even include the retraction? I feel as if what's important about the road is that the PERSONA has not traveled by it. True, he hasn't yet traveled either road, but when he picks a new road, it's less important that it's less traveled by others than that it has never been traveled by him. So, this poem is more about accepting the challenge of change than it is about being stereotypically unique.

Blog Entry 12: Poem Paraphrase: Shakespeare "Marriage of True Minds"

Here is a paraphrase of Shakespeare's "Let me not to the marriage of true minds": There are no barriers in the connection between true lovers. Their love does not change when they change. Instead, their love is permanent, never shaken by storms. Their love is the star by which sailors chart a course. Nor is true love dimmed by time, though the lovers lose their beauty with age. Love does not change with time but lasts until the end of time. If I am wrong about this, I never wrote anything, and no one ever loved.

Blog Entry 11: Yeats's "Leda and the Swan"

William Butler Yeats's "Leda and the Swan" tells the story of the Greek god Zeus raping Leda, a rape that produced daughter Helen, whose abduction sparked the Trojan War. The poem is three stanzas long, with a line break in the middle of the third stanza. It's mostly iambic pentameter with some irregularity.

When I read this poem, I think about Yeats in love with Maud Gonne, who never returned his affection. In the context of this poem, I think that Maud is Yeats's lost Helen, and he blames her for not loving him. Yeats's dissatisfaction with Maud seems to extend to all women, who are at least partly responsible for the tragedies in their lives. In the case of Leda, the persona indicates Leda is "helpless" during the rape but then asks two questions:

How can those terrified vague fingers push
The feathered glory from her loosening thighs?
And how can body, laid in that white rush,
But feel the strange heart beating where it lies? (lines 5-8)

The first question seems almost rhetorical, that Leda had no power to push Zeus away, yet the fact that the question is a question seems to suggest that she might have tried. The second question makes Leda more culpable by wondering how any object of passion could avoid feeling that passion, "the strange heart." In this way, Yeats suggests that Leda is partly responsible for the rape, blaming the victim, which I attribute to his negative attitude toward Maud. It's as if he asks, aren't all women slaves to their emotions?

The last stanza attributes even more destructive a force to women through Helen. The lines indicate that the passion of this moment created Helen and thereby spawned the destruction of Troy:

The broken wall, the burning roof and tower
And Agamemnon dead. (lines 9-10)

These images are understatements: the whole city of Troy was destroyed, not just a wall, roof, and tower, and plenty more people than Agamemnon died. The understatement seems to mourn these losses, even though Agamemnon killed his own daughter, Iphigenia, in order to get favorable winds to carry his army to Troy. Yet, Yeats feels for the loss of Agamemnon in a way he does not feel for the rape of Leda. The line break in the middle of line 10 seems to emphasize the losses associated with Troy as painful tragedy engendering a moment of silence.

The second to last line again points to women as the cause of disaster: "Did she put on his knowledge with his power" (line 11). The question, again, seems rhetorical, in this case suggesting that, yes, Leda did assume god-like knowledge, plotting the destruction of Troy at the moment of Helen's conception, and that women altogether, including Maud Gonne, have that knowledge and wield it to the disadvantage of men.

I really like this poem. It's beautiful. Knowing Yeats's background creates complex undercurrents for me that weave additional meaning throughout. The poem also makes me angry at Yeats: poor baby! Maud doesn't love you. Get over it. Eventually, Yeats would get over Maud, marrying Georgie Hyde-Lees, a woman half his age, who engaged in his creative efforts in a devoted way Maud Gonne would never have done. Maybe women aren't quite as dangerous if they stand by their men?

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Blog Entry 10: Song: Joni Mitchell's "Both Sides Now"

I grew up hearing Joni Mitchell's "Both Sides Now" on the radio but didn't pay much attention to the song until Bend Union High School teacher and OWP Co-Director Amy Sabbadini used it in a teaching demonstration this summer. During the discussion, participating teachers came up with all kinds of interpretations, so here is mine using the first part of the song:


Rows and flows of angel hair
And ice cream castles in the air
And feather canyons everywhere
I've looked at clouds that way

But now they only block the sun

They rain and snow on everyone
So many things I would have done
But clouds got in my way
I've looked at clouds from both sides now

From up and down, and still somehow

It's cloud illusions I recall
I really don't know clouds at all

I think the song is about understanding life. There are many ways to look at life. The song calls them "both sides," emphasizing that the many ways are contradictory. In memory, I look back on experiences as both positive and negative even when those interpretations contradict one another. 


In the lines above, the persona is looking at clouds. This passage uses a physical object as a starting point for more abstract thinking about life. The clouds are both "ice cream castles" and "block[ing] the sun." They are both beautiful fantasy constructions, tenuous as dreams, and also powerful enough to block light and threaten life.  



When looking back on these memories, the persona recalls only the positive, the castles, but she also claims not to "know clouds at all." I think she does know clouds, but it's difficult to put that knowledge into words because the memories are contradictory, and that's the point. Life experiences are complicated. Because of that complexity, we may feel we don't understand them, but we do. We just need to recognize they are contradictory and our interpretations of them are also contradictory. 

Works CitedMitchell, Joni. "Both Sides Now." JoniMitchell.com. 9 March 1967. Web. 1 Aug. 2012. <http://jonimitchell.com/music/song.cfm?id=83>.

x

Blog Entry 9: Haiku

On the street corner,
He waits with his dog, while she
Scolds the bank teller.

Blog Entry 8: Poem Paraphrase: Pound's "In a Station"

In a Station of the Metro
The apparition of these faces in the crowd;
Petals on a wet, black bough.

Paraphrase: The crowd milling at the metro station seems one mass, yet faces emerge briefly, almost like ghosts. I see them individually, as unique as petals defined by droplets of water and by their brilliant color against wood turned black by rain.